From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Joe Nelson <joe@begriffs.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:09:06 -0300
Message-ID: <20190919030906.GA7043@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918221813.GA18650@alvherre.pgsql>
On 2019-Sep-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Well, I think that was useless, so I rebased again -- attached.
... which is how you find out that 0001 as an independent patch is not
really a valid one, since it depends on an API change that does not
happen until 0005.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, joe@begriffs.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com, n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru
Subject: Re: Optimization of some jsonb functions
In-Reply-To: <20190919030906.GA7043@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox