pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mike Palmiotto <mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com>
Cc: Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli.khodorkovskiy@crunchydata.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:56:21 -0300
Message-ID: <20190926145621.GA22843@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMN686G+DAJJFt1WN=uwrN4F5TpwqKjuJa_61TArqHR=L=4PJw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019-Sep-26, Mike Palmiotto wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:49 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > 0002 seems way too large (and it doesn't currently apply).  Is there
> > something we can do to make it more manageable?
> 
> Initially we were thinking of submitting one patch for the
> centralization work and then separate patches per backend type. We
> opted not to go that route, mainly because of the number of resulting
> patches (there were somewhere around 13 total, as I remember). If it
> makes sense, we can go ahead and split the patches up in that fashion
> after rebasing.

Well, I think it would be easier to manage as split patches, yeah.
I think it'd be infrastructure that needs to be carefully reviewed,
while the other ones are mostly boilerplate.  If I were the committer
for it, I would push that initial patch first immediately followed by
conversion of some process that's heavily exercised in buildfarm, wait
until lack of trouble is evident, followed by a trickle of pushes to
adapt the other processes.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190926145621.GA22843@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20190926145621.GA22843@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190926145621.GA22843@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com, yuli.khodorkovskiy@crunchydata.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
  In-Reply-To: <20190926145621.GA22843@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox