From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@eesti.ee>
Subject: Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:13:07 +0900
Message-ID: <20191125081307.GO99720@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64821.1567572978@antos>
References: <20190903165615.GA16727@alvherre.pgsql>
<64821.1567572978@antos>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:56:18AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
> This thread started later than our effort but important design questions are
> being discussed there. So far there seems to be no consensus whether
> full-instance encryption should be implemented first, so any effort spent on
> this patch might get wasted. When/if there will be an agreement on the design,
> we'll see how much of this patch can be used.
I see. I have marked the patch as returned with feedback in CF
2019-11. Let's see how the other one finishes, before perhaps coming
back to this one.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, ah@cybertec.at, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, shawn.wang@highgo.ca, ants.aasma@eesti.ee
Subject: Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
In-Reply-To: <20191125081307.GO99720@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox