From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Hubert Zhang <hzhang@pivotal.io>
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:33:35 +0900
Message-ID: <20191125083335.GQ99720@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910134751.x64idfqj6qgt37om@development>
References: <20190711154011.lmkp7jyd3e2zfcnx@development>
<20190903163633.GA16230@alvherre.pgsql>
<CAAKRu_b6+jC93WP+pWxqK5KAZJC5Rmxm8uquKtEf-KQ++1Li6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20190910134751.x64idfqj6qgt37om@development>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:47:51PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> My feeling is that we should get the BNLJ committed first, and then maybe
> use some of those additional strategies as fallbacks (depending on which
> issues are still unsolved by the BNLJ).
The glacier is melting more. Tomas, what's your status here? The
patch has been waiting on author for two months now. If you are not
planning to work more on this one, then it should be marked as
returned with feedback?
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, melanieplageman@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, hzhang@pivotal.io, thomas.munro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
In-Reply-To: <20191125083335.GQ99720@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox