pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 03:16:39 -0500
Message-ID: <20200323081639.GI2563@telsasoft.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+fd4k6jdiEW_+sPEMWS2TmSnE-ddAdFDSQu9WpXJsK6c2=+-Q@mail.gmail.com >
References: <20200319040758.GP26184@telsasoft.com >
<CAA4eK1LwDGPmAvtOmmHvDTp-KHvcKCW7u36sFKdHjrWJaSVE2w@mail.gmail.com >
<20200319202931.GT26184@telsasoft.com >
<20200320002909.GU26184@telsasoft.com >
<CAA4eK1L_FWiqqBfpm_C8b8bw95EykonbcLWzFFQAC6ucgudZFQ@mail.gmail.com >
<20200320065120.GW26184@telsasoft.com >
<CAA4eK1+TQi4qanvLCOdcMbRKb=nCsJkWPhDi+KmOnkOyi79_Sw@mail.gmail.com >
<20200320145359.GY26184@telsasoft.com >
<CAA4eK1+iuT4gqiqYVdLkOggjA9q5v+dVxT_G3dOyHVokn+YjBg@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+fd4k6jdiEW_+sPEMWS2TmSnE-ddAdFDSQu9WpXJsK6c2=+-Q@mail.gmail.com >
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:39:54PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've already commented on earlier patch but I personally think we'd be
> better to report freespace map vacuum as a separate phase. The
> progress report of vacuum command is used to know the progress but
> this error context would be useful for diagnostic of failure such as
> disk corruption. For visibility map, I think the visibility map bit
> that are processed during vacuum is exactly corresponding to the block
> number but since freespace map vacuum processes the range of blocks
> I've sometimes had trouble with identifying the cause of the problem.
Yea, and it would be misleading if we reported "while scanning block..of
relation" if we actually failed while writing its FSM.
My previous patches did this:
+ case VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_VACUUM_FSM:
+ errcontext("while vacuuming free space map of relation \"%s.%s\"",
+ cbarg->relnamespace, cbarg->relname);
+ break;
Are you suggesting it should report the start (or end?) block number ?
--
Justin
view thread (139+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20200323081639.GI2563@telsasoft.com>
Permalink: ../20200323081639.GI2563@telsasoft.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20200323081639.GI2563@telsasoft.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de, michael@paquier.xyz
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
In-Reply-To: <20200323081639.GI2563@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox