pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 02:57:02 -0500
Message-ID: <20200409075702.GM2228@telsasoft.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1LYqw_MN9=MHcxF6ayvmN2NdaxaqJ5e+f2GobBpfC1AjA@mail.gmail.com >
References: <58c8d171-e665-6fa3-a9d3-d9423b694dae@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+TgmoY6JBix-20yS=EicJVHNAH44QnYGQhyR_c15dZi02KF-w@mail.gmail.com >
<CAKYtNAqzJ8rTh9Mb+2XdsH0dyZb2MS_XH-w8vz3i347etnaFSQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoYkFYRnmTLgPLPm664UdQFBcJTcDZXzBP6dG0zTniYEWQ@mail.gmail.com >
<20200408164154.GD2228@telsasoft.com >
<CAKYtNAogYT+ZNN9Q3eCpdWHVsYR5R-o5p0NtOZHLOkYP-4dxsA@mail.gmail.com >
<20200408183854.GG2228@telsasoft.com >
<CAA4eK1J-CQ4_jt85um8WSeCRjkC4aEtB+Ft43_tFHLVS8n_CQA@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+fd4k5TNziHyAYaeFyL8jHN9aiGnNPv7SJ5YGqj92uZyA_RfQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAA4eK1LYqw_MN9=MHcxF6ayvmN2NdaxaqJ5e+f2GobBpfC1AjA@mail.gmail.com >
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:31:55PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Sure, we can change that, but isn't the existing example of similar
> message "cannot specify both PARSER and COPY options" occurs when
> both the options have valid values? If so, we can use a similar
> principle here, no?
A better comparison is with this one:
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c: pg_log_error("cannot specify both --single-transaction and multiple jobs");
but it doesn't say just: "..specify both --single and --jobs", which would be
wrong in the same way, and which we already dealt with some time ago:
commit 14a4f6f3748df4ff63bb2d2d01146b2b98df20ef
Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: Tue Apr 14 00:06:35 2009 +0000
pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
previous patch.
Per note from Tom.
--
Justin
view thread (33+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20200409075702.GM2228@telsasoft.com>
Permalink: ../20200409075702.GM2228@telsasoft.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20200409075702.GM2228@telsasoft.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com, mahi6run@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com
Subject: Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
In-Reply-To: <20200409075702.GM2228@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox