From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:31:41 -0400
Message-ID: <20200420213140.GA29785@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11667.1587392474@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2020-Apr-20, Tom Lane wrote:
> Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> writes:
> > While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with
> > operators.
> > Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on.
> > Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but
> > still) to find the operator.
>
> Aside from the alternatives already discussed,
There's one with a separate column for the operator, without types, at
the left (the "with names" example at
https://postgr.es/m/14380.1587242177@sss.pgh.pa.us ). That seemed
pretty promising -- not sure why it was discarded.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, vyegorov@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
In-Reply-To: <20200420213140.GA29785@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox