pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 14:24:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <20200514235220.xewrrwjvatxzn3g6@development >
References: <20181002021626.GF11712@paquier.xyz >
<CA+q6zcVFEB--p=e2S-mY6UB87YCBBh=5WXdw2Gqr-2nBGtLkjg@mail.gmail.com >
<20190131112407.zpbysdvghjyh4z47@alap3.anarazel.de >
<CA+q6zcVfsx_YuETPmjkNq-1=kJCS5JuShrL2ZNzm_HRVZ-tiYg@mail.gmail.com >
<20190409152100.5q25whnxs27zws5m@development >
<CA+q6zcVRrd-z4YZ4M43ccst7aGL9==w5r1fionRWhP9ot6mybQ@mail.gmail.com >
<20190503215510.bcr5ycszntqg65tw@development >
<CA+q6zcVjCVkAhoLD6rjDoPGdfWDjQLD=N2tvfH1yU+Eq+iby9w@mail.gmail.com >
<20190524225725.embuha33qvc5avz3@development >
<20200514235220.xewrrwjvatxzn3g6@development >
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:20AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone has plans to try again with this optimization in v14
> cycle? The patches no longer apply thanks to the incremental sort patch,
> but I suppose fixing that should not be extremely hard.
>
> The 2020-07 CF is still a couple weeks away, but it'd be good to know if
> there are any plans to revive this. I'm willing to spend some time on
> reviewing / testing this, etc.
Yes, if you believe that this patch has potential, I would love to pick
it up again.
> I've only quickly skimmed the old thread, but IIRC there were two main
> challenges in getting the optimization right:
>
>
> 1) deciding which orderings are interesting / worth additional work
>
> I think we need to consider these orderings, in addition to the one
> specified in GROUP BY:
>
> 1) as specified in ORDER BY (if different from 1)
What is the idea behind considering this ordering?
view thread (171+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost>
Permalink: ../20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: 9erthalion6@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, teodor@sigaev.ru, GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz, andres@anarazel.de, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
In-Reply-To: <20200516122431.b7wtpm7dspsaxfro@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox