pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:55:52 -0400
Message-ID: <20200630215552.GA21610@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D90E901F-B97A-40A9-86AD-3E42C153A142@enterprisedb.com>

On 2020-Jun-30, Mark Dilger wrote:

> I'm guessing that hardening the backend would be a separate patch?  Or
> did you want that as part of this one?

Lately, to me the foremost criterion to determine what is a separate
patch and what isn't is the way the commit message is structured.  If it
looks too much like a bullet list of unrelated things, that suggests
that the commit should be split into one commit per bullet point; of
course, there are counterexamples.  But when I have a commit message
that says "I do A, and I also do B because I need it for A", then it
makes more sense to do B first standalone and then A on top.  OTOH if
two things are done because they're heavily intermixed (e.g. commit
850196b610d2, bullet points galore), that suggests that one commit is a
decent approach.

Just my opinion, of course.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (218+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200630215552.GA21610@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20200630215552.GA21610@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200630215552.GA21610@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com, dilipbalaut@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
  In-Reply-To: <20200630215552.GA21610@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox