From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgbf@twiska.com, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 19:35:26 -0400
Message-ID: <20200708233526.GA30333@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1738875.1594250690@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2020-Jul-08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Anyway the error is pretty strange: only GetWALAvailability is showing a
> > problem, but the size calculation in the view function def is returning
> > a negative number, as expected.
>
> We've previously noted what seem to be compiler optimization bugs on
> both sparc32 and sparc64; the latest thread about that is
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f28f842d-e82b-4e30-a81a-2a1f9fa4a8e1%40www.fastmail.com
>
> This is looking uncomfortably like the same thing.
Ouch. So 12 builds with -O0 but 13 does not? Did we do something to
sequence.c to work around this problem? I cannot find anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
In-Reply-To: <20200708233526.GA30333@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox