From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:52:14 +0900
Message-ID: <20200723005214.GD26630@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722153605.GA961@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200721043325.GC17300@paquier.xyz>
<20200722153605.GA961@alvherre.pgsql>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> How about we combine both. "Process ID of the parallel group leader, if
> this process is a parallel query worker. NULL if this process is a
> parallel group leader or does not participate in parallel query".
Sounds fine to me. Thanks.
Do others have any objections with this wording?
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20200723005214.GD26630@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, rjuju123@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
In-Reply-To: <20200723005214.GD26630@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox