From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:00:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20200731130014.GC12375@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731.173911.904649928639357911.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
References: <20200731.173911.904649928639357911.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Greetings,
* Kyotaro Horiguchi (horikyota.ntt@gmail.com) wrote:
> PostgreSQL server accepts only one CRL file. It is easy to expand
> be_tls_init to accept a directory set in ssl_crl_file. But I'm not
> sure CRL is actually even utilized in the field so that could ends
> with just bloating the documentation.
>
> Is it work doing?
Yes, CRLs are absolutely used in the field and having this would be
nice.
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
In-Reply-To: <20200731130014.GC12375@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox