pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 22:08:40 -0300
Message-ID: <20201015010840.GA20821@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKU4AWrme6KPToAGJrzPFwaLu_aFqAoXbiSKLR8HTnDwB00z2A@mail.gmail.com>

On 2020-Oct-15, Andy Fan wrote:

> I think if it is possible to implement the detech with a NoWait option .
> 
> ALTER TABLE ... DETACH PARTITION ..  [NoWait].
> 
> if it can't get the lock, raise "Resource is Busy" immediately,
> without blocking others.  this should be a default behavior.   If
> people do want to keep trying, it can set a ddl_lock_timeout to
> 'some-interval',  in this case, it will still block others(so it can't
> be as good as what you are doing, but very simple),  however the user
> would know what would happen exactly and can coordinate with their
> application accordingly.   I'm sorry about this since it is a bit of
> off-topics or it has been discussed already.

Hi.  I don't think this has been discussed, but it doesn't really solve
the use case I want to -- in many cases where the tables are
continuously busy, this would lead to starvation.  I think the proposal
to make the algorithm work with reduced lock level is much more useful.

I think you can already do NOWAIT behavior, with LOCK TABLE .. NOWAIT
followed by DETACH PARTITION, perhaps with a nonzero statement timeout.





view thread (87+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20201015010840.GA20821@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20201015010840.GA20821@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20201015010840.GA20821@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
  In-Reply-To: <20201015010840.GA20821@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox