pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com
Cc: iwata.aya@fujitsu.com
Cc: k.jamison@fujitsu.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:58:59 -0300
Message-ID: <20210203135859.GA25472@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203.111805.1546677784618977625.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

On 2021-Feb-03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:

> Looking the doc mentioned in the comment #39:
> 
> +      <literal>flags</literal> contains flag bits describing the operating mode
> +      of tracing.  If (<literal>flags</literal> &amp; <literal>PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS</literal>) is
> +      true, then timestamp is not printed with each message.
> 
> PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS is designed to *inhibit* timestamps from
> being prepended. If that is actually intended, the symbol name should
> be PQTRACE_NOOUTPUT_TIMESTAMP. Otherwise, the doc need to be fixed.

I'm pretty sure I named the flag PQTRACE_SUPPRESS_TIMESTAMP (and I
prefer SUPPRESS to NOOUTPUT), because the idea is that the timestamp is
printed by default.  I think that's the sensible decision: applications
prefer to have timestamps, even if there's a tiny bit of overhead.  We
don't want to force them to pass a flag for that.  We only want the
no-timestamp behavior in order to be able to use it for libpq internal
testing.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                            39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"Someone said that it is at least an order of magnitude more work to do
production software than a prototype. I think he is wrong by at least
an order of magnitude."                              (Brian Kernighan)





view thread (234+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20210203135859.GA25472@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20210203135859.GA25472@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20210203135859.GA25472@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com, iwata.aya@fujitsu.com, k.jamison@fujitsu.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: libpq debug log
  In-Reply-To: <20210203135859.GA25472@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox