From: 'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org' <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: iwata.aya@fujitsu.com <iwata.aya@fujitsu.com>
Cc: tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>
Cc: k.jamison@fujitsu.com <k.jamison@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:29:28 -0300
Message-ID: <20210310212928.GA16071@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2190484.1615407902@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2021-Mar-10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Or we could rethink the logic. It's not quite clear to me, after
> all this time, why getRowDescriptions() et al are allowed to
> move inStart themselves rather than letting the main loop in
> pqParseInput3 do it. It might well be an artifact of having not
> rewritten the v2 logic too much.
I would certainly prefer that the logic stays put for the time being,
while I finalize the pipelining stuff.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, iwata.aya@fujitsu.com, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com, k.jamison@fujitsu.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
In-Reply-To: <20210310212928.GA16071@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox