From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:43:35 -0300
Message-ID: <202201251843.ajn72lsfpt36@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c42cb38a-ac42-dd92-2935-dce3b9806e26@enterprisedb.com>
On 2022-Jan-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> +decinteger {decdigit}(_?{decdigit})*
> +hexinteger 0[xX](_?{hexdigit})+
> +octinteger 0[oO](_?{octdigit})+
> +bininteger 0[bB](_?{bindigit})+
I think there should be test cases for literals that these seemingly
strange expressions reject, which are a number with trailing _ (0x123_),
and one with consecutive underscores __ (0x12__34).
I like the idea of these literals. I would have found them useful on
many occassions.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, john.naylor@enterprisedb.com
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
In-Reply-To: <202201251843.ajn72lsfpt36@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox