pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 15:11:03 -0700
Message-ID: <20220907221103.GA2095022@nathanxps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907211343.GE26002@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <20220726.104712.912995710251150228.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
<CA+Tgmoa5A4+OVCm5Uiwgd2=M=zNT6nSxA2xh_60=UY5xKttJsA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwZKDSnFsz8d_3YLJpZH8xnD3N4qS-Qv2Us+sK0Ry4fPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+Tgmoa7jS1uvq2s+GLWbCT6e1wH2thfSBHbsF88rtg+Dd4PaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20220823234647.GB31055@tamriel.snowman.net>
<20220905185630.GA1961927@nathanxps13>
<20220906151151.GB26002@tamriel.snowman.net>
<CA+Tgmobi96u71+ChcrtGoymwp=9YzMGCu_vhnDp_avawV96Uyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20220906155432.GA1963795@nathanxps13>
<20220907211343.GE26002@tamriel.snowman.net>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:13:44PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I disagree that we should put the onus for addressing this on the next
> person who wants to add bits and just willfully use up the last of them
> right now for what strikes me, at least, as a relatively marginal use
> case. If we had plenty of bits then, sure, let's use a couple of for
> this, but that isn't currently the case. If you want this feature then
> the onus is on you to do the legwork to make it such that we have plenty
> of bits.
FWIW what I really want is the new predefined roles. I received feedback
upthread that it might also make sense to give people more fine-grained
control, so I implemented that. And now you're telling me that I need to
redesign the ACL system. :)
I'm happy to give that project a try given there is agreement on the
direction and general interest in the patches. From the previous
discussion, it sounds like we want to first use a distinct set of bits for
each catalog table. Is that what I should proceed with?
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
view thread (63+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20220907221103.GA2095022@nathanxps13>
Permalink: ../20220907221103.GA2095022@nathanxps13/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20220907221103.GA2095022@nathanxps13
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, sfrost@snowman.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com
Subject: Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
In-Reply-To: <20220907221103.GA2095022@nathanxps13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox