pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Subject: Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 19:54:43 -0500
Message-ID: <20220912005443.GB31833@telsasoft.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGK--es4iccyAcLrevOdz5Sns4u=nNXDG5nF_G3MaGPggg@mail.gmail.com >
References: <CA+hUKGJ8NRsqgkZEnsnRc2MFROBV-jCnacbYvtpptK2A9YYp9Q@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+hUKGKBngNkTLm1gSmosY6o-azfUvQxALaBSEOjs6KpKYQ9pg@mail.gmail.com >
<162763450191.31964.15384962987091520173.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org >
<CA+Tgmoa9TsiRDQnTm20fMJjWD3W9Lm3kSS8VJJRXeFnoRw6k9g@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+hUKGKiBnK9cB_NAxBOHJ7okw9p46F7ZmBP2FjpdTf5RJxS-g@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoYxi_f14WW6osP61DYQinrVQLyFX1F38NZWHW9xJJmgNg@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+hUKG+egXmO5GYhrhO5WgXziFeVMAE_uSVBEEBqsYh3Tid9fg@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+hUKGK--es4iccyAcLrevOdz5Sns4u=nNXDG5nF_G3MaGPggg@mail.gmail.com >
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:19:22PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 9:52 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:17 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
> > > RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
> > > not to further simplify as in the attached?
> >
> > LGTM.
>
> And pushed.
Gripe: this made the "ps" display worse than before.
7ff23c6d2 Run checkpointer and bgwriter in crash recovery.
A couple years ago, I complained that during the end-of-recovery
checkpoint, the "ps" display still said "recovering NNNNN", which made
it look like it was stuck on a particular WAL file.
That led to commit df9274adf, which updated the startup process's "ps"
to say "end-of-recovery checkpoint".
But since the start process no longer does the checkpoint, it still
says:
postgres 19738 11433 5 19:33 ? 00:00:01 postgres: startup recovering 000000010000000C000000FB
postgres 19739 11433 3 19:33 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer performing end-of-recovery checkpoint
That looks inconsistent. It'd be better if the startup process's "ps"
were cleared.
--
Justin
view thread (24+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20220912005443.GB31833@telsasoft.com>
Permalink: ../20220912005443.GB31833@telsasoft.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20220912005443.GB31833@telsasoft.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, aleksander@timescale.com, michael@paquier.xyz
Subject: Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
In-Reply-To: <20220912005443.GB31833@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox