From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:53:02 +0200
Message-ID: <20220920105302.dyy2na6zfji4ded3@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMsGm5dvPzXiq9=W1kbKcQGQxMHG3JJy1XZD4Dh8hOM7RD_18w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-Sep-19, Isaac Morland wrote:
> I thought I saw some discussion about the SQL standard saying that there is
> a difference between putting NOT NULL in a column definition, and CHECK
> (column_name NOT NULL). So if we're going to take this seriously,
Was it Peter E.'s reply to this thread?
https://postgr.es/m/bac841ed-b86d-e3c2-030d-02a3db067307@enterprisedb.com
because if it wasn't there, then I would like to know what you source
is.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end." (2nd Commandment for C programmers)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, isaac.morland@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
In-Reply-To: <20220920105302.dyy2na6zfji4ded3@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox