From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 14:43:08 -0700
Message-ID: <20230630214308.GC2941194@nathanxps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1817609.1688161218@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20230630200509.GA2830328@nathanxps13>
<1817609.1688161218@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 05:40:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Might be worth asking on pgsql-general whether anyone knows of
> active use of this feature. If not, I'm good with killing it.
Will do.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
In-Reply-To: <20230630214308.GC2941194@nathanxps13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox