From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: tender wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Cc: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:02:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20230803090243.5ba3mapddthv6yhn@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHewXNkL1QC_erA_7mkFHHAU9c56fa3oxuSvRt9cmtyZRY8Zhw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2023-Aug-03, tender wang wrote:
> I think old "sub-FK" should not be dropped, that will be violates foreign
> key constraint.
Yeah, I've been playing more with the patch and it is definitely not
doing the right things. Just eyeballing the contents of pg_trigger and
pg_constraint for partitions added by ALTER...ATTACH shows that the
catalog contents are inconsistent with those added by CREATE TABLE
PARTITION OF.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, tndrwang@gmail.com, jgdr@dalibo.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
In-Reply-To: <20230803090243.5ba3mapddthv6yhn@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox