public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "duplicated" wait events
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 14:46:34 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

At Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:07:51 +0200, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <[email protected]> wrote in 
> SynRep currently appears in "IPC" and "LWLock" (see [2])
> WALWrite currently appears in "IO" and "LWLock" (see [2])
> 
> I think that can lead to confusion and it would be better to avoid
> duplicate wait event
> name across Wait Class (and so fix those 2 ones above), what do you
> think?

I think it would be handy to be able to summirize wait events by event
names, instead of classes. In other words, grouping wait events
through all classes according to their purpose. From that perspective,
I'm rather fan of consolidating event names (that is, the opposite of
your proposal).

However, it seems the event weren't named with this consideration. So
I'm on the fence about this change.


By the way, I couldn't figure out how to tag event names without
messing up the source tree. This causes meson to refuse a build..

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

view thread (2+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: "duplicated" wait events
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox