From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:53:55 +0200
Message-ID: <202509031553.wvk2rr2cighm@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d68e2a4f8c356107e5167408ad80eaa2fac0f57d.camel@j-davis.com>
On 2025-Sep-02, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The good news is that io_uring seemed to solve the problem.
> Unfortunately, that's platform-specific, so it can't be the default.
Why not? We have had wal_sync_method with a platform-dependent default
for a very long time.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@kurilemu.de, pgsql@j-davis.com
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
In-Reply-To: <202509031553.wvk2rr2cighm@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox