public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Andrey M. Borodin <[email protected]>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 10:27:05 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAMT0RQSdKQra6QC4b+eAynpqZ0SYdHDfGBBE7hty33OD9jx7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
"Andrey M. Borodin" <[email protected]> writes:
> This thread has associated CF entry which is marked as RwF [0]. But the change proved to be useful [1] in understanding what we can expect from time source.
> It was requested many times before [2,3]. Reading through this thread it seems to me that my questions about application of the pg_test_timing somehow switched focus from this patch. However, I'd appreciate if it was applied. Nanoseconds seem important to me.
> Let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks!
Basically, I think the code is ready, but I was awaiting Hannu's
proposal on rewriting the documentation for pg_test_timing.
Do you want to have a go at that?
regards, tom lane
view thread (17+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox