public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeremy Schneider <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Banck <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:21:20 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABV9wwNuX2qQt5ZMXFa_MTB++kky4zcaAvCqcfKyCy-uyPcb5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<20240311211204.GA1786481@nathanxps13>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CABV9wwNuX2qQt5ZMXFa_MTB++kky4zcaAvCqcfKyCy-uyPcb5A@mail.gmail.com>
Robert Treat <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:12 PM Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:21:27AM -0700, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
>>> In my view, the best thing would be to move toward consistently using
>>> the word "patch" and moving away from the word "minor" for the
>>> PostgreSQL quarterly maintenance updates.
>> I think "minor" is a better term since it contrasts with "major". We
>> don't actually supply patches to upgrade minor versions.
> I tend to agree with Bruce, and major/minor seems to be the more
> common usage within the industry; iirc, debian, ubuntu, gnome, suse,
> and mariadb all use that nomenclature; and ISTR some distro's who
> release packaged versions of postgres with custom patches applied (ie
> 12.4-2 for postgres 12.4 patchlevel 2).
Agreed, we would probably add confusion not reduce it if we were to
change our longstanding nomenclature for this.
I'm +1 on rewriting these documentation pages though. Seems like
they could do with a whole fresh start rather than just tweaks
around the edges --- what we've got now is an accumulation of such
tweaks.
regards, tom lane
view thread (33+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox