pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com>
Cc: Sokolov Yura <funny.falcon@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:25:15 -0500
Message-ID: <21483.1510158315@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmobvWtWfdSeHg6Abzxi8ROi3QVWVF_pyeYU+pZ5Km_wOfg@mail.gmail.com >
References: <CAL-rCA10_Tf47iCPMLrR9DVKS0cG-we4eRU-7bxtgCPeAbrqog@mail.gmail.com >
<CAGTBQpaq4HAtMO-WPaB5dbrLBXcm69+eZC2C51A1oy4rfO+PMg@mail.gmail.com >
<CAL-rCA1Rk=hU_vEiX5s3_-qCV+mx6JnpsvCr5AeBh57igMvBuw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAGTBQpa7-t41u_AkfgEWtVFDi2j6qZ2-YbnSHhN8oaGkbOJF4Q@mail.gmail.com >
<CAL-rCA1_KLQjhyba7ow0VH9Nd6=iO8GzYSrSFVBDvEX8zeCQ_w@mail.gmail.com >
<CAGTBQpY9RiNGheQcvhTkOqyULvZAjXbjOX1Yj_zmw+zzTg3n6Q@mail.gmail.com >
<CAL-rCA0fcwsWcUb5H8bM8ZCBFbw4iVo-FfOzfRomS+edHeSb5A@mail.gmail.com >
<CAGTBQpaZBjJfYGmc=RQ-mG1cWtArvoNV0gMH4qrBNkiaFFUfAQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAL-rCA2toMO_NwXb6N85wGJ_KRYSCxwzEEc0-hTV0Oyr86wotw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAGTBQpbX6Pv1jLc=CjH67qkKGyuL0EwWcoorjg+UfD4LcfiZ_Q@mail.gmail.com >
<20171107152004.axgznk3n5tkzvnnt@alap3.anarazel.de >
<29007.1510090796@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmobyDksaVkoj=VTFovcw02mMBrjsbx7F9Nvm4tXTHU6HfQ@mail.gmail.com >
<19570.1510155199@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmobvWtWfdSeHg6Abzxi8ROi3QVWVF_pyeYU+pZ5Km_wOfg@mail.gmail.com >
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Just to throw a random idea out here, we currently have
> gen_qsort_tuple.pl producing qsort_tuple() and qsort_ssup(). Maybe it
> could be modified to also produce a specialized qsort_itemids(). That
> might be noticeably faster that our general-purpose qsort() for the
> reasons mentioned in the comments in gen_qsort_tuple.pl, viz:
+1 for somebody trying that (I'm not volunteering, though).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (60+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <21483.1510158315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../21483.1510158315@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/21483.1510158315@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, klaussfreire@gmail.com, funny.falcon@gmail.com, funny.falcon@postgrespro.ru, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi
Subject: Re: Small improvement to compactify_tuples
In-Reply-To: <21483.1510158315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox