From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:42:27 -0400
Message-ID: <21661.1473432147@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160909141542.GB4028@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <20160908183544.GU4028@tamriel.snowman.net>
<20160908192157.GA53172@alvherre.pgsql>
<20160908200912.GW4028@tamriel.snowman.net>
<5611.1473369685@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20160909141542.GB4028@tamriel.snowman.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I saw the various list-based cases and commented in my reply (the one you
> quote part of above) why those didn't seem to make sense for this case
> (it's not a list and I don't see it ever growing into one).
I think Alvaro was simply questioning whether there would ever be a need
for more than two alternatives.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sfrost@snowman.net, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, thom@linux.com
Subject: Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies
In-Reply-To: <21661.1473432147@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox