From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: xl_heap_header alignment?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:58:33 +0200
Message-ID: <22193.1595393913@antos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1058724.1595356403@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <21643.1595353537@antos>
<5A0F3128-D990-4431-9E97-793CD99FF11E@anarazel.de>
<1058724.1595356403@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't particularly want to remove the field, but we ought to
> change or remove the comment.
I'm not concerned about the existence of the field as well. The comment just
made me worried that I might be missing some fundamental concept. Thanks for
your opinion.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: ah@cybertec.at, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: xl_heap_header alignment?
In-Reply-To: <22193.1595393913@antos>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox