From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:40:32 -0400
Message-ID: <22915.1282581632@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282579975-sup-2769@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <201008221651.o7MGplA28857@momjian.us>
<1282579975-sup-2769@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of dom ago 22 12:51:47 -0400 2010:
>> Do you have a suggestion? Reorder the items?
> I'd add another para before that one saying that this value "also"
> affects pg_clog truncation. I agree that putting pg_clog truncation as
> the first item here is not an improvement. For most people, having
> those pg_clog files there or not is going to be a wash, compared to data
> size.
I was going to suggest that the point about pg_clog should be in a
separate paragraph *after* this one, since it seems like a secondary
issue. But anyway, I agree with putting this para back as it was and
talking about clog in a separate para.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, bruce@momjian.us, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
In-Reply-To: <22915.1282581632@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox