From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>
Subject: Re: I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 13:46:53 -0500
Message-ID: <23264.1488048413@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40b87715-b594-9106-16bf-f3a520871902@commandprompt.com>
References: <22067.1488046447@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<40b87715-b594-9106-16bf-f3a520871902@commandprompt.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I don't see a reason to keep pl/tcl in core at all so ripping out the
> functionality seems the least disruptive and perhaps even a deprecation
> of the PL (at least from a core perspective) in v10.
I'm not in any hurry to remove or deprecate PL/Tcl as a whole. It's
gotten more love in the past year than it got in the previous ten,
so evidently there are still people out there who use it. But they
don't seem to be using this particular part of it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jd@commandprompt.com, jan@wi3ck.info
Subject: Re: I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
In-Reply-To: <23264.1488048413@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox