pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Retiring support for pre-7.3 FK constraint triggers
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:52:43 -0500
Message-ID: <23503.1583441563@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <805874E2-999C-4CDA-856F-1AFBD9DFE933@yesql.se>
References: <805874E2-999C-4CDA-856F-1AFBD9DFE933@yesql.se>

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Having code which is untested and not excercised by developers (or users, if my
> assumption holds), yet being reachable by SQL, runs the risk of introducing
> subtle bugs.  Is there a usecase for keeping it, or can/should it be removed in
> 14?  That would still leave a lot of supported versions to upgrade to in case
> there are users to need this.

Pushed.  Looking at the original commit, I noticed one now-obsolete
comment that should also be removed, so I did that.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <23503.1583441563@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../23503.1583441563@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/23503.1583441563@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Retiring support for pre-7.3 FK constraint triggers
  In-Reply-To: <23503.1583441563@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox