public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:30:41 +0200
Message-ID: <24165.1775406641@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-Apr-05, Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> > ok, maybe just skip the whole cleanup in that special case.
>
> Hmm, should we make this test only in the db_specific case? Doing it
> unconditionally makes me a bit nervous (maybe because I don't fully
> understand historic snapshot building).
I thought about adding Assert(db_specific) in front of the new return
statement. So what you suggest makes sense to me.
As far as I understand, the xl_running_xacts record is not directly involved
in the snapshot build. Rather, the list of XIDs for snapshots is created and
updated by processing COMMIT and ABORT records.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
In-Reply-To: <24165.1775406641@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox