From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Henshall, Stuart - WCP <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:59:39 -0500
Message-ID: <2477.1011797979@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F747A1@MAIL_EXCHANGE>
References: <E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F747A1@MAIL_EXCHANGE>
"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk> writes:
> Could you just have a general rule of search in order of age (by OID)?
No, unless you plan to abandon the whole notion of resolving ambiguous
operator/function calls. (Which'd cut down our TODO list a good bit ;-)
but I don't think users would be happy...) OID/age ordering generally
has little to do with reasonable resolution behavior.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk, peter_e@gmx.net, fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
In-Reply-To: <2477.1011797979@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox