pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:09:19 +0100
Message-ID: <2567ae7e-e1dd-48b5-054d-ed6ff81c0335@enterprisedb.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAEZATCWGYooC_Tzt8sQo7760ZEsguj0JGoMLhkANrDwJ9CY20Q@mail.gmail.com >
References: <ad7891d2-e90c-b446-9fe2-7419143847d7@enterprisedb.com >
<3fbbd68b-0b52-cb5a-d468-7e7280c33e6c@enterprisedb.com >
<4654037b-8df8-77fb-2981-67be93aebdf1@enterprisedb.com >
<20201123022604.GD24052@telsasoft.com >
<e5beb5d5-28b4-7aad-3a16-9a6abf57f897@enterprisedb.com >
<6455e0ad-2a2e-bdb0-e1f8-fd4983d1c8aa@enterprisedb.com >
<087086de-1384-8374-4efc-2e7915071d5c@enterprisedb.com >
<CAEZATCU9uPo7JYdx4k0-ufXXZH8t7itodibUwCva+s+AvAKcnw@mail.gmail.com >
<b2995773-c9a1-5d3b-fc90-4f3ab189be11@enterprisedb.com >
<CAEZATCWmQOFUqo4GXPhGsYGrbhYq0J4ZMz8B-LZXptu7S2y2GQ@mail.gmail.com >
<4a2918bb-49b0-ccd5-3af7-f7795941a6ad@enterprisedb.com >
<CAEZATCUiy-Vtj9RfVrTMCQpfVO_VaCD9Dk4jBj0j_eEFEBS1ow@mail.gmail.com >
<958870c8-65e0-31b1-4591-b0b10e807dd9@enterprisedb.com >
<CAEZATCXAPrrOKwEsyZKQ4uzzJQWBCt6QAvOcgqRGdWwT1zb+rQ@mail.gmail.com >
<329203a4-7cad-a0e3-d5a8-ce70872c8156@enterprisedb.com >
<CAEZATCWGYooC_Tzt8sQo7760ZEsguj0JGoMLhkANrDwJ9CY20Q@mail.gmail.com >
On 1/5/21 3:10 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 00:45, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/4/21 4:34 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>>>
>>> * In src/bin/psql/describe.c, I think the \d output should also
>>> exclude the "expressions" stats kind and just list the other kinds (or
>>> have no kinds list at all, if there are no other kinds), to make it
>>> consistent with the CREATE STATISTICS syntax.
>>
>> Not sure I understand. Why would this make it consistent with CREATE
>> STATISTICS? Can you elaborate?
>>
>
> This isn't absolutely essential, but I think it would be neater. For
> example, if I have a table with stats like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE foo(a int, b int);
> CREATE STATISTICS foo_s_ab (mcv) ON a,b FROM foo;
>
> then the \d output is as follows:
>
> \d foo
> Table "public.foo"
> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> a | integer | | |
> b | integer | | |
> Statistics objects:
> "public"."foo_s_ab" (mcv) ON a, b FROM foo
>
> and the stats line matches the DDL used to create the stats. It could,
> for example, be copy-pasted and tweaked to create similar stats on
> another table, but even if that's not very likely, it's neat that it
> reflects how the stats were created.
>
> OTOH, if there are expressions in the list, it produces something like this:
>
> Table "public.foo"
> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> a | integer | | |
> b | integer | | |
> Statistics objects:
> "public"."foo_s_ab" (mcv, expressions) ON a, b, ((a * b)) FROM foo
>
> which no longer matches the DDL used, and isn't part of an accepted
> syntax, so seems a bit inconsistent.
>
> In general, if we're making the "expressions" kind an internal
> implementation detail that just gets built automatically when needed,
> then I think we should hide it from this sort of output, so the list
> of kinds matches the list that the user used when the stats were
> created.
>
Hmm, I see. You're probably right it's not necessary to show this, given
the modified handling of expression stats (which makes them an internal
detail, not exposed to users). I'll tweak this.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
view thread (107+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <2567ae7e-e1dd-48b5-054d-ed6ff81c0335@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink: ../2567ae7e-e1dd-48b5-054d-ed6ff81c0335@enterprisedb.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/2567ae7e-e1dd-48b5-054d-ed6ff81c0335@enterprisedb.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com, dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com
Subject: Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions
In-Reply-To: <2567ae7e-e1dd-48b5-054d-ed6ff81c0335@enterprisedb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox