pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SSI atomic commit
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:48:55 -0400
Message-ID: <2648.1310071735@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E161881.6090800@enterprisedb.com>
References: <4E12FDA8020000250003EFC1@gw.wicourts.gov>
	<4E15D48A.7080203@enterprisedb.com>
	<4E159B5C020000250003F063@gw.wicourts.gov>
	<4E160005.1020300@enterprisedb.com>
	<4E161881.6090800@enterprisedb.com>

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Kevin and Dan also pointed out that a 2PC transaction can stay in 
> prepared state for a long time, and we could optimize that by setting 
> prepareSeqNo only at the final COMMIT PREPARED. I objected to that, for 
> the reason that it's currently very convenient for testing purposes that 
> a transaction prepared with PREPARE TRANSACTION is in the exact same 
> state as regular transaction that's going through regular commit processing.

Seems to me there's a more fundamental reason not to do that, which is
that once you've done PREPARE it is no longer legitimate to decide to
roll back the transaction to get out of a "dangerous" structure --- ie,
you have to target one of the other xacts involved instead.  Shouldn't
the assignment of a prepareSeqNo correspond to the point where the xact
is no longer a target for SSI rollback?

			regards, tom lane



view thread (26+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <2648.1310071735@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../2648.1310071735@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/2648.1310071735@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
  Subject: Re: SSI atomic commit
  In-Reply-To: <2648.1310071735@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox