public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matheus Alcantara <[email protected]>
To: Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Koval <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:23:33 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPpHfds2NsGvpi4fK-xBDk9S=ZY8FEsG-a3z7m_cRSJhn5GKvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALdSSPjXtzGM7Uk4fWRwRMXcCczge5uNirPQcYCHKPAWPkp9iQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfdvQSmRAHu1BRTVcvgons_Smt0QW+mLP4np=QxG==WyFAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAPpHfds2NsGvpi4fK-xBDk9S=ZY8FEsG-a3z7m_cRSJhn5GKvQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 21/04/26 12:57, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I've spotted the following things in this patch.
> 1) The equality of dependencies is not fully checked.  We only check
> that for each new dependency, we have the same for previous partition,
> but not vise versa.
> 2) The complexity of dependency checking is O(n^2).
> 3) Usage of citext and other extensions in src/test/regress where they
> might be not available.
> 

Oops, I forgot to replace the citext extension on split partition tests.

> I've revised the patch.
> 1) collectPartitionIndexExtDeps() is rewritten().  Now it works in
> three phases: collect, sort, compare.  The comparison phase requires
> strict equivalence of dependencies and doesn't depend on the order.
> The complexity is now O(n * log(n)), which I think is acceptable.
> 2) PartitionIndexExtDepEntry struct now have indexOid.  So, on
> conflict error contains both partition index names.
> 3) Tests moved to
> src/test/modules/test_extensions/sql/test_extdepend.sql where
> test_ext3/test_ext5 extensions are available.
> 4) More tests for different scenarios.
> 
> Could you, please, review this changes?
> 

I think that you miss to include the patch?

--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com





view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox