From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ubsan
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:54:50 -0400
Message-ID: <2771659.1648058090@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220323173537.ll7klrglnp4gn2um@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <20220323173537.ll7klrglnp4gn2um@alap3.anarazel.de>
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I tried to run postgres with ubsan to debug something.
For 0001, could we just replace configure's dlopen check with the
dlsym check? Or are you afraid of reverse-case failures?
0002: ugh, but my only real complaint is that __ubsan_default_options
needs more than zero comment. Also, it's not "our" getenv is it?
0003: OK. Interesting though that we haven't seen these before.
0004: no opinion
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: ubsan
In-Reply-To: <2771659.1648058090@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox