From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:14:16 -0500
Message-ID: <28557.1011734056@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C4DD34F.CC4D8B6@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0201211840260.687-100000@peter.localdomain>
<12239.1011661590@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3C4D8A39.FF79CDC4@redhat.com>
<15339.1011716171@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3C4D96C5.80BBF764@redhat.com>
<15638.1011718290@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3C4DCBDB.689D7201@redhat.com>
<28199.1011732109@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3C4DD34F.CC4D8B6@redhat.com>
Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes:
> Switches set to historical:
> schema search path = (user's own schema, "any" schema, postgres)
> [ default creation schema = user's own schema ]
> The searching in "any" schema (i.e., any owner) will let will find
> things that where defined the way they are today, i.e., possibly
> by several different users.
No, it won't, because nothing will ever get put into that schema.
(At least not by existing pg_dump scripts, which are the things that
really need to see the historical behavior.) The
default-creation-schema variable has got to point at any/public/
whatever-we-call it, or you do not have the historical behavior.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, fnasser@redhat.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
In-Reply-To: <28557.1011734056@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox