pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails to detect unsupported arrays and ranges
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:47:51 -0400
Message-ID: <2940601.1619642871@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7062C2A2-BF72-41EC-A058-9A31F8AAC550@yesql.se>
References: <31473.1573412838@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<124042D9-F307-402A-80ED-395C154858BA@yesql.se>
	<4978.1573420358@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<63DE9A1C-5F59-47AF-90C9-26A7EF9897B3@yesql.se>
	<12987.1573427177@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<2798740.1619622555@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<7062C2A2-BF72-41EC-A058-9A31F8AAC550@yesql.se>

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 28 Apr 2021, at 17:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> +		pg_fatal("Your installation contains system-defined composite type(s) in user tables.\n"
>> +				 "These type OIDs are not stable across PostgreSQL versions,\n"
>> +				 "so this cluster cannot currently be upgraded.  You can\n"
>> +				 "remove the problem tables and restart the upgrade.\n"
>> +				 "A list of the problem columns is in the file:\n"

> Would it be helpful to inform the user that they can alter/drop just the
> problematic columns as a potentially less scary alternative to dropping the
> entire table?

This wording is copied-and-pasted from the other similar tests.  I agree
that it's advocating a solution that might be overkill, but if we change
it we should also change the existing messages.  I don't mind doing
that in HEAD; less sure about the back branches, as (I think) these
are translatable strings.

Thoughts?

>> -		 * The type of interest might be wrapped in a domain, array,
>> +		 * The types of interest might be wrapped in a domain, array,

> Shouldn't this be "type(s)” as in the other changes here?

Fair enough.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <2940601.1619642871@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../2940601.1619642871@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/2940601.1619642871@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails to detect unsupported arrays and ranges
  In-Reply-To: <2940601.1619642871@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox