pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: gcov coverage data not full with immediate stop
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:04:31 -0400
Message-ID: <29504.1589227471@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmobgAFRM1+fxxga9yy1Sw7nzRu+gtE0N1DnbiaD4n0Sp1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200511034243.GA5671@alvherre.pgsql>
	<28859.1589172997@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmobgAFRM1+fxxga9yy1Sw7nzRu+gtE0N1DnbiaD4n0Sp1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree, but also, we should start thinking about when to branch. I,
> too, have patches that aren't critical enough to justify pushing them
> post-freeze, but which are still good improvements that I'd like to
> get into the tree. I'm queueing them right now to avoid the risk of
> destabilizing things, but that generates more work, for me and for
> other people, if their patches force me to rebase or the other way
> around. I know there's always a concern with removing the focus on
> release N too soon, but the open issues list is 3 items long right
> now, and 2 of those look like preexisting issues, not new problems in
> v13. Meanwhile, we have 20+ active committers.

Yeah.  Traditionally we've waited till the start of the next commitfest
(which I'm assuming is July 1, for lack of an Ottawa dev meeting to decide
differently).  But it seems like things are slow enough that perhaps
we could branch earlier, like June 1, and give the committers a chance
to deal with some of their own stuff before starting the CF.

This is the wrong thread to be debating that in, though.  Also I wonder
if this is really RMT turf?

			regards, tom lane





view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <29504.1589227471@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../29504.1589227471@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/29504.1589227471@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, exclusion@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: gcov coverage data not full with immediate stop
  In-Reply-To: <29504.1589227471@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox