From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:01:53 -0500
Message-ID: <29795.1133236913@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511291429330.18112@linuxworld.com.au>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511282217470.13586@josh.db>
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0511291429330.18112@linuxworld.com.au>
Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO
Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, swm@linuxworld.com.au, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
In-Reply-To: <29795.1133236913@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox