From: Давыдов Виталий <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 11:21:38 +0300
Message-ID: <2a5ab6-677f8700-1f-36d162c0@246596326> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z3Hyj3kvkj3b9dFi@paquier.xyz>
References: <13b5b6-676c3080-4d-531db900@47931709>
<Z2yKWtB4iB8BdEiI@paquier.xyz>
<Z2zq-GrOpIDPOHUj@paquier.xyz>
<152dda-676d7200-61-659acf0@102179597>
<Z25ZHgw220Pt0uIH@paquier.xyz>
<16aa85-676ec500-3d-23db9b40@59039559>
<Z3Hyj3kvkj3b9dFi@paquier.xyz>
On Monday, December 30, 2024 04:08 MSK, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Instead, I have gone with a new
> FullTransactionIdFromCurrentEpoch() that replaces
> AdjustToFullTransactionId(). It cleans up most of the calls to
> ReadNextFullTransactionId() compared to the previous patch. It is
> true that these couple with calls to ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer(), but the
> result felt OK this way in the scope of this fix.
Could you please send the latest version of the patch, if any? I haven't found any new patches in the latest email.
Happy New Year!
With best regards,
Vitaly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: v.davydov@postgrespro.ru, michael@paquier.xyz
Subject: Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic
In-Reply-To: <2a5ab6-677f8700-1f-36d162c0@246596326>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox