From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 21:51:38 -0400
Message-ID: <3012983.1662429098@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b52105d-b1ae-1c51-1794-2280e7c8cf06@postgresql.org>
References: <CA+hUKGLYYaXWQfoEgPLsQ-6DwpEUZzbh6g_xhfF+yN=jTHC1mw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGL=+0nF8o8xG5DDUepG0ZxgDXusF=Jqtd7FmtFvmR1Gmg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGJXfQJHs2jmVOoOo2J12-6m36E0ytDiyrqp-EvFwupvew@mail.gmail.com>
<20220905.143436.1254379754225361598.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
<CA+hUKG+vsm00hYtwSyQX9T2cw3qX_d6ZDgAtT9Z+4reO4ePt8A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGJxUy9EW-vkiqN_iYO5TFEJfijSwLrQCdHCB8KkVVWmgw@mail.gmail.com>
<7b52105d-b1ae-1c51-1794-2280e7c8cf06@postgresql.org>
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> On 9/5/22 7:18 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Well I was about to commit this, but beta4 just got stamped (but not
>> yet tagged). I see now that Jonathan (with RMT hat on, CC'd) meant
>> commits should be in by the *start* of the 5th AoE, not the end. So
>> the procedural/RMT question is whether it's still possible to close
>> this item in beta4.
> Presumably because Tom stamped it, the released is wrapped so it
> wouldn't make Beta 4, but I defer to him to see if it can be included
> with the tag.
I already made the tarballs available to packagers, so adding this
would involve a re-wrap and great confusion. In any case, I'm not
a fan of pushing fixes within a day or two of the wrap deadline,
let alone after it; you get inadequate buildfarm coverage when you
cut corners that way. I think this one missed the boat.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jkatz@postgresql.org, thomas.munro@gmail.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com, tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com, sfrost@snowman.net, andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net
Subject: Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
In-Reply-To: <3012983.1662429098@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox