From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Cc: coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
Cc: thomas.munro@gmail.com
Cc: m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: teodor@sigaev.ru
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:02:59 -0400
Message-ID: <3028358.1648144979@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324.134924.883806150160900709.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp>
References: <20220323.190809.88053056758099179.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp>
<2775989.1648060014@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20220324114320.b1f4fba241ecc58413f72d40@sraoss.co.jp>
<20220324.134924.883806150160900709.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp>
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
>> My hoary animal prairiedog doesn't like this [1]:
> My machine (Ubuntu 20) did not complain either. Maybe perl version
> difference? Any way, the fix pushed. Let's see how prairiedog feels.
Still not happy. After some digging in man pages, I believe the
problem is that its old version of Perl does not understand "\gN"
backreferences. Is there a good reason to be using that rather
than the traditional "\N" backref notation?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ishii@sraoss.co.jp, nagata@sraoss.co.jp, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr, thomas.munro@gmail.com, m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, teodor@sigaev.ru
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
In-Reply-To: <3028358.1648144979@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox