pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: andres@anarazel.de
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:52:17 -0400
Message-ID: <31348.1402415537@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <20140610153347.GM8406@alap3.anarazel.de >
References: <29121.1316185073@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<1316355543.12186.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net >
<15953.1316362868@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<1316420754.14001.3.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com >
<16241.1316441883@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CABwTF4XDdYiBQXqj=CKrFXN7x2NiBbVnpHSJG6AVnMBLnLBmLA@mail.gmail.com >
<20140610143202.GI8406@alap3.anarazel.de >
<30402.1402412692@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<20140610150933.GK8406@alap3.anarazel.de >
<30709.1402413628@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<20140610153347.GM8406@alap3.anarazel.de >
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
andres@anarazel.de (Andres Freund) writes:
> On 2014-06-10 11:20:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought once the fork_process code has reset our
>> process's setting to zero it's not possible to lower it again (without
>> privileges we'd not have).
> No, doesn't look that way. It's possible to reset it to the value set at
> process start. So unless we introduce double forks for every backend
> start it can be reset by ordinary processes.
That's kind of annoying --- I wonder why they went to the trouble of doing
that? But anyway, it's probably not worth the cost of double-forking to
prevent it. I still say though that this is not a reason to make it as
easy as change-a-GUC to break the intended behavior.
Robert's idea of having the start script set an environment variable to
control the OOM adjustment reset seems like it would satisfy my concern.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (66+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <31348.1402415537@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../31348.1402415537@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/31348.1402415537@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, gurjeet@singh.im, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
In-Reply-To: <31348.1402415537@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox