From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 14:04:10 -0400
Message-ID: <32347.1522865050@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180404172114.vdclwe4lxlt4c6fd@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20180404172114.vdclwe4lxlt4c6fd@alvherre.pgsql>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Thanks, pushed.
This has broken the selinux regression tests, evidently because it
removed ONLY from the emitted FK test queries. While we could change
the expected results, I would first like to hear a defense of why that
change is a good idea. It seems highly likely to be the wrong thing
for non-partitioned cases.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables
In-Reply-To: <32347.1522865050@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox