From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:13:36 -0400
Message-ID: <326462.1597274016@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812223853.d45ddez273cqaf4u@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <3170626.1594842723@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200812221313.zfqsfcpt2tmkv4la@alap3.anarazel.de>
<324385.1597271356@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200812223853.d45ddez273cqaf4u@alap3.anarazel.de>
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Given that pg_dump already re-orders the columns for DDL, could we make
> it apply that re-ordering not just during the CREATE TABLE, but also
> when dumping the table contents?
Hm, possibly. I think when this was last looked at, we didn't have any
way to get COPY to output the columns in non-physical order, but now we
do.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dependencies for partitioned indexes are still a mess
In-Reply-To: <326462.1597274016@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox