public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql
@ 2023-01-28 01:39  Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2023-01-28 01:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>; +Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>; pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom, is there a reason we run the various sanity tests early-ish in the
> schedule? It does seem to reduce their effectiveness a bit...

Originally, those tests were mainly needed to sanity-check the
hand-maintained initial catalog data, so it made sense to run them
early.  Since we taught genbki.pl to do a bunch more work, that's
perhaps a bit less pressing.

There's at least one test that intentionally sets up a bogus btree
opclass, which we'd have to drop again if we wanted to run the
sanity checks later.  Not sure what other issues might surface.
You could find out easily enough, of course ...

> Problems:
> - "Cross-check against pg_type entry" is far too strict about legal combinations
>   of typstorage

Perhaps, but it's enforcing policy about what we want in the
initial catalog data, not what is possible to support.  So
there's a bit of divergence of goals here too.  Maybe we need
to split up the tests into initial-data-only tests (run early)
and tests that should hold for user-created objects too
(run late)?

			regards, tom lane






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql
@ 2023-01-28 02:30  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2023-01-28 02:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>; pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-01-27 20:39:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom, is there a reason we run the various sanity tests early-ish in the
> > schedule? It does seem to reduce their effectiveness a bit...
> 
> Originally, those tests were mainly needed to sanity-check the
> hand-maintained initial catalog data, so it made sense to run them
> early.

It's also kinda useful to have some basic validity testing early on, because
if there's something wrong with the catalog values, it'll cause lots of issues
later.


> > Problems:
> > - "Cross-check against pg_type entry" is far too strict about legal combinations
> >   of typstorage
> 
> Perhaps, but it's enforcing policy about what we want in the
> initial catalog data, not what is possible to support.

True in generaly, but I don't think it matters much in this specific case. We
don't gain much by forbidding 'e' -> 'x' mismatches, given that we allow 'x'
-> 'p'.


There's a lot more such cases in opr_sanity. There's a lot of tests in it that
only make sense for validating the initial catalog contents. It might be
useful to run a more lenient version of it later though.


> So there's a bit of divergence of goals here too.  Maybe we need to split up
> the tests into initial-data-only tests (run early) and tests that should
> hold for user-created objects too (run late)?

Yea, I think so. A bit worried about the duplication that might require.

But the *sanity tests also do also encode a lot of good cross-checks, that are
somewhat easy to break in code (and / or have been broken in the past), so I
think it's worth pursuing.

Greetings,

Andres Freund






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/7] Row pattern recognition patch (docs).
@ 2023-06-26 08:05  Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Tatsuo Ishii @ 2023-06-26 08:05 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml   | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/src/sgml/func.sgml       | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml | 29 +++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml
index 755c9f1485..e9bbd5bc7c 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml
@@ -537,6 +537,58 @@ WHERE pos &lt; 3;
     <literal>rank</literal> less than 3.
    </para>
 
+   <para>
+    Window function <function>rpr</function> can be used with row pattern
+    common syntax to perform row pattern recognition in a query. Row pattern
+    common syntax includes two sub clauses. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines
+    definition variables along with an expression. The expression must be a
+    logical expression, which means it must
+    return <literal>TRUE</literal>, <literal>FALSE</literal>
+    or <literal>NULL</literal>. Moreover if the expression comprises a column
+    reference, it must be the argument of <function>rpr</function>. An
+    example of <literal>DEFINE</literal> is as follows.
+
+<programlisting>
+DEFINE
+ LOWPRICE AS price &lt;= 100,
+ UP AS price &gt; PREV(price),
+ DOWN AS price &lt; PREV(price)
+</programlisting>
+
+    Note that <function>PREV</function> returns price column in the previous
+    row if it's called in a context of row pattern recognition. So in the
+    second line means the definition variable "UP" is <literal>TRUE</literal>
+    when price column in the current row is greater than the price column in
+    the previous row. Likewise, "DOWN" is <literal>TRUE</literal> when when
+    price column in the current row is lower than the price column in the
+    previous row.
+   </para>
+   <para>
+    Once <literal>DEFINE</literal> exists, <literal>PATTERN</literal> can be
+    used. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows that satisfies
+    certain conditions.  For example following <literal>PATTERN</literal>
+    defines that a row starts with the condition "LOWPRICE", then one or more
+    rows satisfy "UP" and finally one or more rows satisfy "DOWN". If a
+    sequence of rows found, rpr returns the column at the starting row.
+    Example of a <literal>SELECT</literal> using the <literal>DEFINE</literal>
+    and <literal>PATTERN</literal> clause is as follows.
+
+<programlisting>    
+SELECT company, tdate, price, rpr(price) OVER w FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  LOWPRICE AS price &lt;= 100,
+  UP AS price &gt; PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price &lt; PREV(price)
+);
+</programlisting>
+   </para>
+
    <para>
     When a query involves multiple window functions, it is possible to write
     out each one with a separate <literal>OVER</literal> clause, but this is
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index 5a47ce4343..8069c58ca5 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
@@ -21648,6 +21648,22 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable;
         returns <literal>NULL</literal> if there is no such row.
        </para></entry>
       </row>
+
+      <row>
+       <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature">
+        <indexterm>
+         <primary>rpr</primary>
+        </indexterm>
+        <function>rpr</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> )
+        <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue>
+       </para>
+       <para>
+        Perform row pattern recognition using column specified
+        by <parameter>value</parameter> and returns the value of the column if
+        current row is the first matching row;
+        returns <literal>NULL</literal> otherwise.
+       </para></entry>
+      </row>
      </tbody>
     </tgroup>
    </table>
@@ -21687,6 +21703,59 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable;
    Other frame specifications can be used to obtain other effects.
   </para>
 
+  <para>
+   Row pattern recognition navigation functions are listed in
+   <xref linkend="functions-rpr-navigation-table"/>.  These functions
+   can be used to describe DEFINE clause of Row pattern recognition.
+  </para>
+
+   <table id="functions-rpr-navigation-table">
+    <title>Row Pattern Navigation Functions</title>
+    <tgroup cols="1">
+     <thead>
+      <row>
+       <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature">
+        Function
+       </para>
+       <para>
+        Description
+       </para></entry>
+      </row>
+     </thead>
+
+     <tbody>
+      <row>
+       <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature">
+        <indexterm>
+         <primary>prev</primary>
+        </indexterm>
+        <function>prev</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> )
+        <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue>
+       </para>
+       <para>
+        Returns the column value at the previous row;
+        returns NULL if there is no previous row in the window frame.
+       </para></entry>
+      </row>
+
+      <row>
+       <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature">
+        <indexterm>
+         <primary>next</primary>
+        </indexterm>
+        <function>next</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> )
+        <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue>
+       </para>
+       <para>
+        Returns the column value at the next row;
+        returns NULL if there is no next row in the window frame.
+       </para></entry>
+      </row>
+
+     </tbody>
+    </tgroup>
+   </table>
+
   <note>
    <para>
     The SQL standard defines a <literal>RESPECT NULLS</literal> or
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml
index 0ee0cc7e64..16478a3950 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml
@@ -966,8 +966,8 @@ WINDOW <replaceable class="parameter">window_name</replaceable> AS ( <replaceabl
     The <replaceable class="parameter">frame_clause</replaceable> can be one of
 
 <synopsis>
-{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ]
-{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ]
+{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax]
+{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax]
 </synopsis>
 
     where <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable>
@@ -1074,6 +1074,31 @@ EXCLUDE NO OTHERS
     a given peer group will be in the frame or excluded from it.
    </para>
 
+   <para>
+    The
+    optional <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable>
+    defines the <firstterm>row pattern recognition condition</firstterm> for
+    this
+    window. <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable>
+    includes following subclauses. <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST
+    ROW</literal> or <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> controls
+    how to proceed to next row position after a match
+    found. With <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW</literal> (the
+    default) next row position is next to the last row of previous match. On
+    the other hand, with <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> next
+    row position is always next to the last row of previous
+    match. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines definition variables along with a
+    boolean expression. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows
+    that satisfies certain conditions using variables defined
+    in <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause.
+
+<synopsis>
+[ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW | AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW ]
+PATTERN <replaceable class="parameter">pattern_variable_name</replaceable>[+] [, ...]
+DEFINE <replaceable class="parameter">definition_varible_name</replaceable> AS <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> [, ...]
+</synopsis>    
+   </para>
+
    <para>
     The purpose of a <literal>WINDOW</literal> clause is to specify the
     behavior of <firstterm>window functions</firstterm> appearing in the query's
-- 
2.25.1


----Next_Part(Mon_Jun_26_17_45_07_2023_724)--
Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="v2-0006-Row-pattern-recognition-patch-tests.patch"



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-26 08:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-28 01:39 Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2023-01-28 02:30 ` Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2023-06-26 08:05 [PATCH v2 5/7] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox