From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:06:18 -0400
Message-ID: <3749169.1598745978@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200807213544.GA3434@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200807213544.GA3434@alvherre.pgsql>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I pushed despite the objection because it seemed that downstream
> discussion was largely favorable to the change, and there's a different
> proposal to solve the bloat problem for analyze; and also:
Note that this quasi-related patch has pretty thoroughly hijacked
the CF entry for James' original docs patch proposal. The cfbot
thinks that that's the latest patch in the original thread, and
unsurprisingly is failing to apply it.
Since the discussion was all over the place, I'm not sure whether
there's still a live docs patch proposal or not; but if so, somebody
should repost that patch (and go back to the original thread title).
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de, jtc331@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago
In-Reply-To: <3749169.1598745978@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox