pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:26:26 -0400
Message-ID: <3954319.1635175586@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmobzrGnGr9PYF-hYbDuayQg_eGq=JdgddqDp7d+4uzfm=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+TgmoboH6=SgWHPddv_8ie91Qf2ECKSvg-72aYajKb2gyLYQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<202110222351.3f42l5fgo3lw@alvherre.pgsql>
	<CA+TgmobB8cj30z6dzEf5xNTxzGRNGmkJsCr3nv_Hneo0o5kozg@mail.gmail.com>
	<3783090.1635111977@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmobQxeGVtgxQz_OxdgCO4r=Tb2SaCh9FJ8Dxjaq9DxHH_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<3883429.1635171820@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoYF2xUB=witcYipb6nriLGN48463RpS6v1mhGA_whLNMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<3888809.1635174042@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmobzrGnGr9PYF-hYbDuayQg_eGq=JdgddqDp7d+4uzfm=Q@mail.gmail.com>

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Actually, I think we do.  If I want to test against 7.4, ISTM I want
>> to test against the last released 7.4 version, not something with
>> arbitrary later changes.  Otherwise, what exactly is the point?

> 1. You're free to check out any commit you like.

Yeah, and get something that won't build.  If there's any point
to this work at all, it has to be that we'll maintain the closest
possible buildable approximation to the last released version.

> Oh, OK. I wonder how that plays with the buildfarm status page's
> desire to drop old results that are more than 30 days old. I guess
> you'd just need to force a run at least every 28 days or something.

I don't think it's a problem.  If we haven't committed anything to
branch X in a month, it's likely not interesting.  It might be worth
having a way to get the website to show results further back than
a month, but that doesn't need to be in the default view.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (70+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3954319.1635175586@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../3954319.1635175586@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3954319.1635175586@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, andrew@dunslane.net, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
  In-Reply-To: <3954319.1635175586@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox